HOME    REVIEWS    LETTERS    ABOUT    CONTACT   



Gaslight (1944)

Gaslight

The Company Line

Paula Alquist hears footsteps in the attic that is closed off. She sees lights flicker and dim. This is making her think she is losing her mind, but that is precisely what what "her treacherous husband Gregory hopes will happen." This movie is "steeped in escalating dread" and contains "flawless portrayals." Ingrid Bergman is noted for this role winning her the first of her three Academy Awards and Charles Boyer is credited as playing against type as the "smoothly evil Gregory." They also tell you that the movie was nominated for seven Oscars including Best Picture and for Angela Lansbury's debut (when she was only 18!).

1944, 114 minutes, VHS

The Review

This is the Hollywood version of a movie made over in Britain back in 1940 (didn't they have a war to fight?) about a wife, her new mysterious foreign husband and some stolen jewels (are the alarm bells ringing yet?). Since no one ever saw the original, I guess that makes this one the definitive version. It probably also helps that this one stars Charles Boyer, Ingrid Bergman, and Joseph Cotten, while the other one stars a bunch of British citizens that should have been off keeping Jerry out of France or something. This is one of those movies that seems to have a reputation for being a high class, psychological thriller that will take your breath away and leave you wondering how you made it through so much of your life without ever having seen it. I know this sounds like the prelude to some kind of snarky put down, but I liked this movie. You have good performances particularly from Boyer as the slimy villain that can switch with ease from being the smoothly handsome husband with a good set of manners to being a controlling maniac that has only one thing on his mind (its jewels, but not Ingrid's jewels, if you catch my meaning) and will stop at nothing, no matter how complicated and far fetched, to get what he wants. There's some decent atmosphere as well, with a London from the 1870s that looks like Lucio Fulci left his fog machine rolling the last time he visited Big Ben. Shoot, this movie even has Angela Lansbury in one of her prehistoric roles (she may have not been a hundred years old back in 1944, but she still had the face of an old busy body). The movie realized that since Angela would still need to ferment a bit before she became an old busy body, they needed to throw in an old broad to fill that role (though she was little more than comic relief) giving this movie two busy bodies for the price of one. This may not be 1878 or even 1944 and it really isn't the fault of this movie, but you can't help but feel the story is a bit minor league. "Guy tries to drive wife insane for monetary reward" reeks of one of those TV movies with Kate Jackson and/or Jack Wagner. These still make it to the big screen on occasion but they usually end up starring someone like Ashley Judd or Tom Berenger. I suppose the person I blame the most is Alfred Hitchcock. His movies trained you to expect the unexpected and dealt with truly dangerous people. I never got the impression that Boyer was that dangerous (his character killed someone years ago off-screen, but he spent most of his time playing mind games with Ingrid when he could have been burying her in the basement). The other thing was that nothing unexpected took place. Everything unfolded like you expected it to, right down to the hunky police captain or lieutenant or whatever he was jumping in to save the day. Expectations aside though, the movie is enjoyable for what it is: the exploration of an out of balance relationship and the trust you place in the ones you love the most (and stolen jewels, too!)

Young Paula is hustled out of London after the death of her beloved aunt, who just also happens to be some kind of singing sensation. As is the case with most survivors of violent crime, Paula has won herself an all expense paid trip to beautiful...Italy! Yes, you and the raving maniac piano player of your choice will get spend several years in the land of Argento, Fulci, and Bava (both of them!). While there, you will try and follow in the melodic footsteps of your aunt, but be sidetracked by the smooth-talking Charles Boyer who is after a bunch of really sweet jewels that your dead aunt got from some shadowy royal figure. Or you can pass and bid on Showcase #2. So, Paula is now living in Italy years later and spends her days having her voice trained by her aunt's old teacher. It becomes apparent however that her singing is not up to snuff and her teacher, being the kind grandfatherly type all of us would desire to have instead of the dried up old witches that tried in vain to teach us how to play the piano, he immediately discerns that her caterwauling is not the result of being a better actress than singer, but instead is because she is in love. She breathes a sigh of relief now that she can quit her gig as crappy singer and start her new job as wife to crazy guy she barely knows. But who is this guy that she is willing to ditch an unfulfilling and probably doomed career as a singer? Why he's the piano player that has been accompanying her practice sessions! His name is Gregory and they are in love and he wants to marry her right away, but she needs time to think about it so she does what any of us out of work singers would do and takes the train to some Italian resort (unconvincingly played by a soundstage somewhere in California). On the train she meets up with an old gossip named Miss Thwaits and in one of those coincidences that only happens in suspense movies about women in danger, she happens to live in Thornton Square right across the street from where Paula lived and where her aunt was killed! Paula doesn't let on about her connection to Thornton Square and gets off at the resort only to find Gregory waiting for her. It's still early in the relationship so she's really excited to see him instead of being pissed that now she won't get to watch HBO in the air conditioned hotel room by herself. They decide to hurry up and get married and somehow they decide to move back to London right smack into the same old house as the one her aunty was bumped off in. It always amazes me in these movies how readily people are to move back into the place where something heinous (and always unsolved!) has taken place in. I guess it just shows how strong these people are. Or how contrived the plots of these things are. Either way it gets them back into the thick of...terror!

Once they get back home to their comfy and very dusty place on Thornton Square, we see that everything is just how it was left after the unsolved murder of her aunt all those years ago (well everything that is except for the presence of her aunt's strangled corpse - good taste would dictate that that would have been removed discreetly through the back entrance). We get to see a painting of her aunt in some gaudy costume from one of her cabaret shows or whatever it was she did (new hubby Greg has that monstrosity tagged for the attic immediately) and Paula whips out a glove that her aunt wore on one of the performances. The other glove in the pair was given to an adoring fan way back when. If I was Greg, I'd be thinking that all this bric-a-brac was going to find its way onto ebay in a hurry and that the house would be re-decorated with a Chicago Cubs theme or something. Everything is going okay until, Paula finds a letter to her aunt written two days before her death, from some admirer named Serges. Greg goes nuts and grabs the letter from her and then tries to play it off that he was upset because all the memories were upsetting her. Greg then starts putting his dastardly plan into action. First he hires a tart named Nancy (Lansbury) to be the maid. Nancy is not the highest class type gal you could hope to meet and she spends most of her time being snooty and trying to get laid by the cop that walks the beat by Greg and Paula's house. Greg and Paula decide to go on a little tour of London to see the crown jewels and the Tower of London with all the torture devices (that's a romantic getaway for you!). Before going out, Greg makes a big show out of giving Paula some ugly broach and tells her not to lose it like it was her mind or something. Greg comes off as a smarmy jerk, even in the early going as he continuously puts Paula down for losing things and forgetting things and basically treats her like she was his slow daughter or something. They go out for their little trip and sure enough, that crazy dame has gone ahead and lost the broach! Or has she? And who is that mysterious stranger that is hunkily tipping his hat to her? Why it's Brian Cameron, the not-at-all-British-sounding assistant to the head of Scotland Yard!

Brian turns out to be one of the dead aunt's biggest fans and he thinks he has seen a ghost since Paula looks exactly like her (except for being all strangled and stuff). Naturally, since she's hot and married to a mysterious foreigner, Brian decides that it is time to re-open the case. Not just the murder case mind you, but the case of the missing jewels as well. It turns out that the public was never told that some royal guy gave the aunt some jewels and that those jewels were never recovered. His superior tells Brian to back off the case and it turns out not because of any sinister involvement of the higher ups, but just because they don't feel like dredging up a case they couldn't solve before. Being the hunky rogue cop he is, he gets another cop transferred to Thornton Square to walk the beat, lay Nancy, and get all the dirt on what's going on with Paula and her husband. Meanwhile, Greg is turning up the heat on Paula, telling everyone (and by everyone, I mean that gossipy old hag from across the street) that Paula is too sick to come out and play. He is also ratcheting up his psychological warfare on her by moving pictures around and then blaming her. Paula begins to fear that she is losing her mind. If that seems far-fetched, that someone could be driven slowly insane like that, then you've never been in a relationship with someone that you would trust with your life. If you're convinced that the other person is telling the truth about all this crazy crap that you're supposedly doing, the only option is to believe that you yourself are going nucking futs. The movie does a good job at showing us the scary things we potentially set ourselves up for when we enter into a relationship with someone we don't truly know (for a far more graphic and interesting version of this situation see Audition). There are other things going on that don't help Paula. The gaslight flickers and gets lower when it shouldn't and she hears footsteps in the closed off attic. Adding to the mystery is that her husband goes out every night to supposedly practice his music at some little room he's rented that she's never seen (he needs to be by himself to work).

It turns out that Brian is the guy that the aunt gave the glove to and that he has kept it all these years. As scary as that is, he apparently still likes women, so he and his beat cop pal follow Greg around at night in the mists of London and figure out that he is going back into a vacant house near his own and then crossing over on the roof and getting back into the attic to look for the missing jewels. Makes sense to me. The movie has a fairly anticlimactic ending where Brian tells all this to Paula and then has a brief and mostly off-screen confrontation with Greg that ends with Greg tied up in the attic. The movie should be about over here, but they let Paula go in to confront Greg for no real reason but to give the audience the catharsis from him tormenting and tricking her for the last ninety minutes. The whole thing feels tacked on. It would have been more effective if she had actually done something to get herself out of things, like investigating or subduing the guy, but she basically sat around all movie waiting for Prince Charming to bust in and save her bacon. I'm not sure how likely it is that some guy would wait ten years to marry the niece of the woman he killed for some jewels that he doesn't know where they're at, especially when he could have just done the same plan of running around the attic without waiting. If he could get into a vacant house next to the aunt's, then he could get into the aunt's house while it was vacant and searched to his greedy little heart was content. Bergman won an Oscar for her role, an Oscar that should have gone to Barbara Stanwyck for her much more memorable role as the soulless wife in Double Indemnity, but Bergman manages to take the weak-willed woman role and give more layers than is usually the case. Frequently, Greg thinks he has her under his thumb, but then she'll show a little spine and demand to go out somewhere or she'll continue to have doubts that she truly is insane, so she isn't the total doormat you usually see in films like this. Boyer is effective, though he's another one of those screen villains that unnecessarily complicates things for the sake of drama. Couldn't he just tell Paula he was going through her aunt's things to sort out what needed to be kept and what needed to be stored or sold? This is a solid, if overrated film with stars that knew how to wring the most out of the material they were given. I was probably guilty of going into this with too high of expectations, but I can't say that I didn't enjoy what was up on the screen. Good performances by Boyer and Bergman illuminated the isolation and mental domination that mark dysfunctional relationships though the finished product was marred a bit by the rather unremarkable (and hokey) story.

Reviews © 2004 MonsterHunter